精通
英语
和
开源
，
擅长
开发
与
培训
，
胸怀四海
第一信赖
精通
英语
和
开源
，
擅长
开发
与
培训
，
胸怀四海
第一信赖
What are the Struts and Hibernate frameworks?
什么是Struts和Hibernate框架？
Is google a little too much for you to handle?
是不是谷歌有点太牛了？
Really, it requires VERY LITTLE effort to type that into the google search bar.
真的，它需要很少的努力，键入到谷歌搜索栏。
Ok Thanks. Can you tell me why we cannot extend more than one class in java.
好，谢谢。你能告诉我，为什么我们不能在Java里扩展多个类。
You're probably asking about the non-existance of multiple inheritance in Java. As John would probably say: "Why not google first" Try something like: Java multiple inheritance. If you still have question about it then please start a new question.
你可能会问关于Java的多重继承为什么存在不了。正如约翰可能会说：“为什么不尝试Google”尝试类似：Java的多重继承。如果您仍然有问题吧，那么请开始一个新的问题。
"Apache Struts[^] is a free open-source framework for creating Java web applications."
“Apache Struts [^]是创建Java Web应用程序的免费开源框架。”
Apache Struts, Website
Apache Struts，网站
"Hibernate facilitated the storage and retrieval of Java domain objects via Object/Relational Mapping. Today, Hibernate is a collection of related projects enabling developers to utilize POJO-style domain models in their applications in ways extending well beyond Object/Relational Mapping"
“Hibernate促进通过对象/关系映射Java域对象的存储和检索。今天，Hibernate是相关项目的集合，它使开发人员能够利用其应用POJO风格的域模型，以超越了对象/关系映射的良好扩展方法来使用”
Hibernate, JBoss Community Website
Hibernate，JBoss社区网站
Hibernate[^] is framework for relational persistance in Java and .NET.
Hibernate[^]是关系持久性框架，用在Java和.NET。
There is an abundance of information, documentation and examples on these two sites. If you have studied these two frameworks a little feel free to come back and ask more specific questions.
这两个项目有丰富的资料。如果你学过这两个框架，有点感觉后，再来问更具体的问题。
This question in not completely incorrect, but can be greatly improved. You should have re-formulated it:
这个问题不是完全不正确，但可以大大提高。你应该重新制定它：
"What are Wikipedia, Google, CodeProject and StackOverflow.com?"
“什么是维基百科，谷歌，在CodeProject和StackOverflow.com？”
If you asked and got good Answers, the Questions like your original one would not be needed!
如果你问，得到了很好的答案，就没有必要像原来的一个问题！
Eventhough it's not really a direct answer to OP's question, it is probably the answer to most of the questions that are being asked in this forum. Have my 5!
尽管它已经不是一个真正的直接回答OP的问题，这可能是答案大部分是被要求在这个论坛的问题。有我的5！
Thank you very much. I agree with you and I hope I will be able to reference it in other Answers, as anyone else.
非常感谢你。我同意你的看法，我希望我能够引用它在其他的答案，因为任何人。
I would have re-arranged the list as
我会重新安排的名单
"What are Google, CodeProject, StackOverflow.com and Wikipedia?"
“什么是谷歌，CodeProject上，StackOverflow.com和维基百科？”
Wikipedia is mixed bag. There are a lot of good entries and equally garbage.
维基百科是鱼龙混杂。有很多很好的作品，同样的垃圾。
No. Even though Wikipedia is mixed, overall tactics starting with Wikipedia and it it is not good enough going to Google gives faster results, on average. I tried to compare many times. So I mean it. But actually it depends in question. The concepts and well-named conceptions (I hope you know the difference) are better found on Wikipedia, APIs on Google, tricky problems -- on CodeProject and StackOverflow.com.
号虽然维基百科是混合的，整体的战术开始，维基百科和它是不是足够好去谷歌给出更快的结果，平均。我试着比较了很多次。所以，我是认真的。但实际上这取决于有问题。的概念和良好的命名概念（我希望你知道的差值）在维基百科上更好地发现，在谷歌的API，棘手的问题 - 在CodeProject和StackOverflow.com。
So what, you're discussing search skills already? Or relative value of different sources (the biggest problem is a great amount on incorrect material posted on the Web)?
还等什么，你在谈论的搜索技巧了吗？或不同来源的相对值（最大的问题是在Web上发布不正确的材料量很大）？
Anyway, anyone if free to understand my list as unordered container. You see, I did not explicitly stated this order should be preferred. I wanted to write "in this order" but decided that individually chosen order base on question is more useful. Would you agree now?
无论如何，如果任何人自由地理解我的列表为无序的容器。你看，我并没有明确说明这个顺序应该是首选。我想写“在这个顺序”，但决定问题上各自选择顺序基础更加有用。你现在同意吗？